“AI art isn’t real art” boring, pedantic, relies on defining the undefinable and an ever changing goalpost of what Real Art is.
“AI art is fueled by massive art theft” correct, concrete demonstration of the harm it’s doing to actual human beings and not just the nebulous concept of Art Itself.
like ai art generators will definitely try to generate signatures. bc its sourced from stolen art.
so funny to me that raspberry pi just tanked their good standing they built up for a decade in like. a day
I actually don’t understand why video games need good graphics
I see someone complain about the graphics in Mario kart for wii. I’m like why do you care. I can throw a bomb at the guy in first place.
I stopped being impressed by “realistic” video game graphics around 2013. Why do I need to see all the pores in my character’s neck? Does that make shooting the bad guys more fun?
...that your audience won't hate.
This is a method I started using when NFTs were on the rise - thieves would have to put actual work into getting rid of the mark - and one that I am now grateful for with the arrival of AI. Why? Because anyone who tries to train an AI on my work will end up with random, disruptive color blobs.
I can't say for sure it'll stop theft entirely, but it WILL make your images annoying for databases to incorporate, and add an extra layer of inconvenience for thieves. So as far as I'm concerned, that's a win/win.
I'll be showing the steps in CSP, but it should all be pretty easy to replicate in Photoshop.
Now: let's use the above image as our new signature file. I set mine to be 2500 x 1000 pixels when I'm just starting out.
“i don’t block people just because of a difference of opinion” cool i do
this is a space where you can go “bestie you’re not on my enrichment team” and then throw them out of the window of your life without hesitation
throwback to last month when i fell asleep on the couch and when i woke up my first instinct was to take a pic of my cat sleeping across me but ended up flashbanging her instead
